Core Hydration vs San Pellegrino: which water is healthier?

Updated · Scores from third-party lab reports · How we score

San Pellegrino is the healthier choice, scoring 67/100 versus 50/100 for Core Hydration. The biggest differences are packaging material and water source.

Core Hydration Plastic Bottle

Core Hydration

Core Hydration Plastic Bottle

50
San Pellegrino Sparkling Mineral Water Glass Bottle

San Pellegrino

San Pellegrino Sparkling Mineral Water Glass Bottle

67

Side-by-side comparison

Core HydrationSan Pellegrino
Purity score50/10067/100
Product comparedCore Hydration Plastic BottleSan Pellegrino Sparkling Mineral Water Glass Bottle
TypeStillSparkling
Water sourceMunicipal SupplyMountain Spring
PackagingPlasticGlass
Microplastics riskHighLow
Lab testedYesYes
PFAS testedNoYes
Contaminants flagged26
pH7.45.18
TDS (minerals)78 ppm901 ppm
Fluoride0 mg/L0.47 mg/L

Score breakdown

FactorCore HydrationSan Pellegrino
Lab report indexed45/4545/45
Contaminants0/500/50
Water source15/2525/25
Mineral preservation17/1717/17
Packaging material2/2222/22
Cap material7/70/7
PFAS testing0/55/5

Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Core Hydration and San Pellegrino.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Core Hydration or San Pellegrino?

San Pellegrino is the healthier choice, scoring 67/100 versus 50/100 for Core Hydration. The biggest differences are packaging material and water source.

Is Core Hydration or San Pellegrino better for avoiding microplastics?

Core Hydration (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and San Pellegrino (glass) has a low risk, based on packaging material.

Which has more minerals, Core Hydration or San Pellegrino?

San Pellegrino has more dissolved minerals (901 ppm TDS vs 78 ppm).

More comparisons