Hallstein vs Eternal Water: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Hallstein is the healthier choice, scoring 86/100 versus 85/100 for Eternal Water. The biggest differences are packaging material.
Side-by-side comparison
| Hallstein | Eternal Water | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 86/100 | 85/100 |
| Product compared | Hallstein Water Glass Bottle | Eternal Water Gallon |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Aquifer | Mountain Spring |
| Packaging | Glass | Plastic |
| Microplastics risk | Low | High |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | Yes | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 2 | 2 |
| pH | 8.6 | 8.1 |
| TDS (minerals) | 98 ppm | 110 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | β |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Hallstein | Eternal Water |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 26/50 | 44/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 22/22 | 2/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 7/7 |
| PFAS testing | 5/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Hallstein and Eternal Water.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Hallstein or Eternal Water?
Hallstein is the healthier choice, scoring 86/100 versus 85/100 for Eternal Water. The biggest differences are packaging material.
Is Hallstein or Eternal Water better for avoiding microplastics?
Hallstein (glass) has a low microplastics risk and Eternal Water (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Hallstein or Eternal Water?
Eternal Water has more dissolved minerals (110 ppm TDS vs 98 ppm).

