Deer Park vs Hallstein: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Hallstein is the healthier choice, scoring 86/100 versus 59/100 for Deer Park. The biggest differences are contaminants and packaging material.
Side-by-side comparison
| Deer Park | Hallstein | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 59/100 | 86/100 |
| Product compared | Deer Park Spring Water Plastic Bottle | Hallstein Water Glass Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Spring | Aquifer |
| Packaging | Plastic | Glass |
| Microplastics risk | High | Low |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | Yes | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 13 | 2 |
| pH | 6.55 | 8.6 |
| TDS (minerals) | 120 ppm | 98 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | 0 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Deer Park | Hallstein |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 26/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 22/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 7/7 |
| PFAS testing | 5/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Deer Park and Hallstein.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Deer Park or Hallstein?
Hallstein is the healthier choice, scoring 86/100 versus 59/100 for Deer Park. The biggest differences are contaminants and packaging material.
Is Deer Park or Hallstein better for avoiding microplastics?
Deer Park (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Hallstein (glass) has a low risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Deer Park or Hallstein?
Deer Park has more dissolved minerals (120 ppm TDS vs 98 ppm).

