Aquafina vs Deer Park: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Deer Park is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 50/100 for Aquafina. The biggest differences are water source and PFAS testing.
Side-by-side comparison
| Aquafina | Deer Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 50/100 | 59/100 |
| Product compared | Aquafina Plastic Bottle | Deer Park Spring Water Plastic Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Municipal Supply | Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Plastic |
| Microplastics risk | High | High |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | No | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 3 | 13 |
| pH | 6.4 | 6.55 |
| TDS (minerals) | β | 120 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0.08 mg/L | 0 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Aquafina | Deer Park |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 0/50 |
| Water source | 15/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 2/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 7/7 |
| PFAS testing | 0/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Aquafina and Deer Park.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Aquafina or Deer Park?
Deer Park is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 50/100 for Aquafina. The biggest differences are water source and PFAS testing.
Is Aquafina or Deer Park better for avoiding microplastics?
Aquafina (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Deer Park (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Aquafina or Deer Park?
Total dissolved solids (TDS) is not reported for both products, so check each product page for its mineral list.

