Aquafina vs Ozarka: which water is healthier?

Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score

Ozarka is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 50/100 for Aquafina. The biggest differences are water source and PFAS testing.

Side-by-side comparison

AquafinaOzarka
Purity score50/10059/100
Product comparedAquafina Plastic BottleOzarka Spring Water Plastic Bottle
TypeStillStill
Water sourceMunicipal SupplySpring
PackagingPlasticPlastic
Microplastics riskHighHigh
Lab testedYesYes
PFAS testedNoYes
Contaminants flagged38
pH6.46.2
TDS (minerals)β€”94 ppm
Fluoride0.08 mg/L0 mg/L

Score breakdown

FactorAquafinaOzarka
Lab report indexed45/4545/45
Contaminants0/500/50
Water source15/2525/25
Mineral preservation17/1717/17
Packaging material2/222/22
Cap material7/77/7
PFAS testing0/55/5

Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Aquafina and Ozarka.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Aquafina or Ozarka?

Ozarka is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 50/100 for Aquafina. The biggest differences are water source and PFAS testing.

Is Aquafina or Ozarka better for avoiding microplastics?

Aquafina (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Ozarka (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.

Which has more minerals, Aquafina or Ozarka?

Total dissolved solids (TDS) is not reported for both products, so check each product page for its mineral list.

More comparisons