Aquafina vs San Pellegrino: which water is healthier?

Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score

San Pellegrino is the healthier choice, scoring 67/100 versus 50/100 for Aquafina. The biggest differences are packaging material and water source.

Side-by-side comparison

AquafinaSan Pellegrino
Purity score50/10067/100
Product comparedAquafina Plastic BottleSan Pellegrino Sparkling Mineral Water Glass Bottle
TypeStillSparkling
Water sourceMunicipal SupplyMountain Spring
PackagingPlasticGlass
Microplastics riskHighLow
Lab testedYesYes
PFAS testedNoYes
Contaminants flagged36
pH6.45.18
TDS (minerals)β€”901 ppm
Fluoride0.08 mg/L0.47 mg/L

Score breakdown

FactorAquafinaSan Pellegrino
Lab report indexed45/4545/45
Contaminants0/500/50
Water source15/2525/25
Mineral preservation17/1717/17
Packaging material2/2222/22
Cap material7/70/7
PFAS testing0/55/5

Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Aquafina and San Pellegrino.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Aquafina or San Pellegrino?

San Pellegrino is the healthier choice, scoring 67/100 versus 50/100 for Aquafina. The biggest differences are packaging material and water source.

Is Aquafina or San Pellegrino better for avoiding microplastics?

Aquafina (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and San Pellegrino (glass) has a low risk, based on packaging material.

Which has more minerals, Aquafina or San Pellegrino?

Total dissolved solids (TDS) is not reported for both products, so check each product page for its mineral list.

More comparisons