Arrowhead vs Ozarka: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Ozarka is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 57/100 for Arrowhead. The biggest differences are PFAS testing.
Side-by-side comparison
| Arrowhead | Ozarka | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 57/100 | 59/100 |
| Product compared | Arrowhead Mountain Spring Water Gallon | Ozarka Spring Water Plastic Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Mountain Spring | Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Plastic |
| Microplastics risk | High | High |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | No | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 6 | 8 |
| pH | 7.5 | 6.2 |
| TDS (minerals) | 135.5 ppm | 94 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0.5 mg/L | 0 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Arrowhead | Ozarka |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 1/50 | 0/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 2/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 7/7 |
| PFAS testing | 0/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Arrowhead and Ozarka.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Arrowhead or Ozarka?
Ozarka is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 57/100 for Arrowhead. The biggest differences are PFAS testing.
Is Arrowhead or Ozarka better for avoiding microplastics?
Arrowhead (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Ozarka (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Arrowhead or Ozarka?
Arrowhead has more dissolved minerals (135.5 ppm TDS vs 94 ppm).

