Arrowhead vs Zephyrhills: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Arrowhead is the healthier choice, scoring 57/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are contaminants.
Side-by-side comparison
| Arrowhead | Zephyrhills | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 57/100 | 56/100 |
| Product compared | Arrowhead Mountain Spring Water Gallon | Zephyrhill Plastic Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Mountain Spring | Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Plastic |
| Microplastics risk | High | High |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | No | No |
| Contaminants flagged | 6 | 9 |
| pH | 7.5 | 7.95 |
| TDS (minerals) | 135.5 ppm | 230 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0.5 mg/L | 0 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Arrowhead | Zephyrhills |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 1/50 | 0/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 2/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 7/7 |
| PFAS testing | 0/5 | 0/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Arrowhead and Zephyrhills.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Arrowhead or Zephyrhills?
Arrowhead is the healthier choice, scoring 57/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are contaminants.
Is Arrowhead or Zephyrhills better for avoiding microplastics?
Arrowhead (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Zephyrhills (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Arrowhead or Zephyrhills?
Zephyrhills has more dissolved minerals (230 ppm TDS vs 135.5 ppm).

