Deer Park vs Acqua Panna: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Acqua Panna is the healthier choice, scoring 68/100 versus 59/100 for Deer Park. The biggest differences are packaging material and contaminants.
Side-by-side comparison
| Deer Park | Acqua Panna | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 59/100 | 68/100 |
| Product compared | Deer Park Spring Water Plastic Bottle | Acqua Panna Spring Water Glass Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Spring | Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Glass |
| Microplastics risk | High | Low |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | Yes | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 13 | 5 |
| pH | 6.55 | 7.66 |
| TDS (minerals) | 120 ppm | 100 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | 0 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Deer Park | Acqua Panna |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 2/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 22/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 0/7 |
| PFAS testing | 5/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Deer Park and Acqua Panna.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Deer Park or Acqua Panna?
Acqua Panna is the healthier choice, scoring 68/100 versus 59/100 for Deer Park. The biggest differences are packaging material and contaminants.
Is Deer Park or Acqua Panna better for avoiding microplastics?
Deer Park (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Acqua Panna (glass) has a low risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Deer Park or Acqua Panna?
Deer Park has more dissolved minerals (120 ppm TDS vs 100 ppm).

