Deer Park vs Pure Life: which water is healthier?

Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score

Deer Park is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 50/100 for Pure Life. The biggest differences are water source and PFAS testing.

Side-by-side comparison

Deer ParkPure Life
Purity score59/10050/100
Product comparedDeer Park Spring Water Plastic BottlePure Life Purified Water with Minerals Plastic Bottle
TypeStillStill
Water sourceSpringMunicipal Supply
PackagingPlasticPlastic
Microplastics riskHighHigh
Lab testedYesYes
PFAS testedYesNo
Contaminants flagged136
pH6.557.2
TDS (minerals)120 ppm40 ppm
Fluoride0 mg/L0 mg/L

Score breakdown

FactorDeer ParkPure Life
Lab report indexed45/4545/45
Contaminants0/500/50
Water source25/2515/25
Mineral preservation17/1717/17
Packaging material2/222/22
Cap material7/77/7
PFAS testing5/50/5

Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Deer Park and Pure Life.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Deer Park or Pure Life?

Deer Park is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 50/100 for Pure Life. The biggest differences are water source and PFAS testing.

Is Deer Park or Pure Life better for avoiding microplastics?

Deer Park (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Pure Life (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.

Which has more minerals, Deer Park or Pure Life?

Deer Park has more dissolved minerals (120 ppm TDS vs 40 ppm).

More comparisons