Deer Park vs Ice Mountain: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Deer Park and Ice Mountain tie at 59/100. The difference comes down to packaging and source: compare the rows below to pick the one that fits what you care about.

Deer Park
Deer Park Spring Water Plastic Bottle
59
Ice Mountain
Ice Mountain Spring Water Plastic Bottle
59Side-by-side comparison
| Deer Park | Ice Mountain | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 59/100 | 59/100 |
| Product compared | Deer Park Spring Water Plastic Bottle | Ice Mountain Spring Water Plastic Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Spring | Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Plastic |
| Microplastics risk | High | High |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | Yes | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 13 | 13 |
| pH | 6.55 | 7.2 |
| TDS (minerals) | 120 ppm | 191 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | 0.2 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Deer Park | Ice Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 0/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 2/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 7/7 |
| PFAS testing | 5/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Deer Park and Ice Mountain.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Deer Park or Ice Mountain?
Deer Park and Ice Mountain tie at 59/100. The difference comes down to packaging and source: compare the rows below to pick the one that fits what you care about.
Is Deer Park or Ice Mountain better for avoiding microplastics?
Deer Park (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Ice Mountain (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Deer Park or Ice Mountain?
Ice Mountain has more dissolved minerals (191 ppm TDS vs 120 ppm).