Deer Park vs Voss: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Voss is the healthier choice, scoring 74/100 versus 59/100 for Deer Park. The biggest differences are packaging material and contaminants.
Side-by-side comparison
| Deer Park | Voss | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 59/100 | 74/100 |
| Product compared | Deer Park Spring Water Plastic Bottle | Voss Still Water (Norway) Glass Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Spring | Aquifer |
| Packaging | Plastic | Glass |
| Microplastics risk | High | Low |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | Yes | No |
| Contaminants flagged | 13 | 2 |
| pH | 6.55 | 6.2 |
| TDS (minerals) | 120 ppm | 38 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | 0.1 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Deer Park | Voss |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 11/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 22/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 7/7 |
| PFAS testing | 5/5 | 0/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Deer Park and Voss.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Deer Park or Voss?
Voss is the healthier choice, scoring 74/100 versus 59/100 for Deer Park. The biggest differences are packaging material and contaminants.
Is Deer Park or Voss better for avoiding microplastics?
Deer Park (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Voss (glass) has a low risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Deer Park or Voss?
Deer Park has more dissolved minerals (120 ppm TDS vs 38 ppm).

