Evian vs Kirkland Signature: which water is healthier?

Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score

Kirkland Signature is the healthier choice, scoring 63/100 versus 59/100 for Evian. The biggest differences are contaminants.

Side-by-side comparison

EvianKirkland Signature
Purity score59/10063/100
Product comparedEvian Spring Water Plastic BottleKirkland Signature Purified Water Plastic Bottle
TypeStillStill
Water sourceMountain SpringMunicipal Supply
PackagingPlasticPlastic
Microplastics riskHighHigh
Lab testedYesYes
PFAS testedYesYes
Contaminants flagged41
pH8.35.9
TDS (minerals)326 ppmβ€”
Fluoride0 mg/L0 mg/L

Score breakdown

FactorEvianKirkland Signature
Lab report indexed45/4545/45
Contaminants0/5017/50
Water source25/2515/25
Mineral preservation17/1717/17
Packaging material2/222/22
Cap material7/77/7
PFAS testing5/55/5

Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Evian and Kirkland Signature.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Evian or Kirkland Signature?

Kirkland Signature is the healthier choice, scoring 63/100 versus 59/100 for Evian. The biggest differences are contaminants.

Is Evian or Kirkland Signature better for avoiding microplastics?

Evian (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Kirkland Signature (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.

Which has more minerals, Evian or Kirkland Signature?

Total dissolved solids (TDS) is not reported for both products, so check each product page for its mineral list.

More comparisons