Evian vs Zephyrhills: which water is healthier?
Updated · Scores from third-party lab reports · How we score
Evian is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are PFAS testing.
Side-by-side comparison
| Evian | Zephyrhills | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 59/100 | 56/100 |
| Product compared | Evian Spring Water Plastic Bottle | Zephyrhill Plastic Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Mountain Spring | Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Plastic |
| Microplastics risk | High | High |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | Yes | No |
| Contaminants flagged | 4 | 9 |
| pH | 8.3 | 7.95 |
| TDS (minerals) | 326 ppm | 230 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | 0 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Evian | Zephyrhills |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 0/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 2/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 7/7 |
| PFAS testing | 5/5 | 0/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Evian and Zephyrhills.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Evian or Zephyrhills?
Evian is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are PFAS testing.
Is Evian or Zephyrhills better for avoiding microplastics?
Evian (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Zephyrhills (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Evian or Zephyrhills?
Evian has more dissolved minerals (326 ppm TDS vs 230 ppm).