Evian vs Ozarka: which water is healthier?

Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score

Evian and Ozarka tie at 59/100. The difference comes down to packaging and source: compare the rows below to pick the one that fits what you care about.

Side-by-side comparison

EvianOzarka
Purity score59/10059/100
Product comparedEvian Spring Water Plastic BottleOzarka Spring Water Plastic Bottle
TypeStillStill
Water sourceMountain SpringSpring
PackagingPlasticPlastic
Microplastics riskHighHigh
Lab testedYesYes
PFAS testedYesYes
Contaminants flagged48
pH8.36.2
TDS (minerals)326 ppm94 ppm
Fluoride0 mg/L0 mg/L

Score breakdown

FactorEvianOzarka
Lab report indexed45/4545/45
Contaminants0/500/50
Water source25/2525/25
Mineral preservation17/1717/17
Packaging material2/222/22
Cap material7/77/7
PFAS testing5/55/5

Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Evian and Ozarka.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Evian or Ozarka?

Evian and Ozarka tie at 59/100. The difference comes down to packaging and source: compare the rows below to pick the one that fits what you care about.

Is Evian or Ozarka better for avoiding microplastics?

Evian (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Ozarka (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.

Which has more minerals, Evian or Ozarka?

Evian has more dissolved minerals (326 ppm TDS vs 94 ppm).

More comparisons