Ozarka vs Eternal Water: which water is healthier?
Updated · Scores from third-party lab reports · How we score
Eternal Water is the healthier choice, scoring 85/100 versus 59/100 for Ozarka. The biggest differences are contaminants.
Side-by-side comparison
| Ozarka | Eternal Water | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 59/100 | 85/100 |
| Product compared | Ozarka Spring Water Plastic Bottle | Eternal Water Gallon |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Spring | Mountain Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Plastic |
| Microplastics risk | High | High |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | Yes | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 8 | 2 |
| pH | 6.2 | 8.1 |
| TDS (minerals) | 94 ppm | 110 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | — |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Ozarka | Eternal Water |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 44/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 2/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 7/7 |
| PFAS testing | 5/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Ozarka and Eternal Water.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Ozarka or Eternal Water?
Eternal Water is the healthier choice, scoring 85/100 versus 59/100 for Ozarka. The biggest differences are contaminants.
Is Ozarka or Eternal Water better for avoiding microplastics?
Ozarka (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Eternal Water (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Ozarka or Eternal Water?
Eternal Water has more dissolved minerals (110 ppm TDS vs 94 ppm).