Ozarka vs Perrier: which water is healthier?
Updated · Scores from third-party lab reports · How we score
Perrier is the healthier choice, scoring 67/100 versus 59/100 for Ozarka. The biggest differences are packaging material.
Side-by-side comparison
| Ozarka | Perrier | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 59/100 | 67/100 |
| Product compared | Ozarka Spring Water Plastic Bottle | Perrier Sparkling Mineral Water Glass Bottle |
| Type | Still | Sparkling |
| Water source | Spring | Aquifer |
| Packaging | Plastic | Glass |
| Microplastics risk | High | Low |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | Yes | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 8 | 3 |
| pH | 6.2 | 5.2 |
| TDS (minerals) | 94 ppm | 470 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | — |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Ozarka | Perrier |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 0/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 22/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 0/7 |
| PFAS testing | 5/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Ozarka and Perrier.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Ozarka or Perrier?
Perrier is the healthier choice, scoring 67/100 versus 59/100 for Ozarka. The biggest differences are packaging material.
Is Ozarka or Perrier better for avoiding microplastics?
Ozarka (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Perrier (glass) has a low risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Ozarka or Perrier?
Perrier has more dissolved minerals (470 ppm TDS vs 94 ppm).