Ozarka vs San Pellegrino: which water is healthier?
Updated · Scores from third-party lab reports · How we score
San Pellegrino is the healthier choice, scoring 67/100 versus 59/100 for Ozarka. The biggest differences are packaging material.
Ozarka
Ozarka Spring Water Plastic Bottle
59
San Pellegrino
San Pellegrino Sparkling Mineral Water Glass Bottle
67Side-by-side comparison
| Ozarka | San Pellegrino | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 59/100 | 67/100 |
| Product compared | Ozarka Spring Water Plastic Bottle | San Pellegrino Sparkling Mineral Water Glass Bottle |
| Type | Still | Sparkling |
| Water source | Spring | Mountain Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Glass |
| Microplastics risk | High | Low |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | Yes | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 8 | 6 |
| pH | 6.2 | 5.18 |
| TDS (minerals) | 94 ppm | 901 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | 0.47 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Ozarka | San Pellegrino |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 0/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 22/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 0/7 |
| PFAS testing | 5/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Ozarka and San Pellegrino.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Ozarka or San Pellegrino?
San Pellegrino is the healthier choice, scoring 67/100 versus 59/100 for Ozarka. The biggest differences are packaging material.
Is Ozarka or San Pellegrino better for avoiding microplastics?
Ozarka (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and San Pellegrino (glass) has a low risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Ozarka or San Pellegrino?
San Pellegrino has more dissolved minerals (901 ppm TDS vs 94 ppm).