Ozarka vs Saratoga Spring Water: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Saratoga Spring Water is the healthier choice, scoring 67/100 versus 59/100 for Ozarka. The biggest differences are packaging material.
Side-by-side comparison
| Ozarka | Saratoga Spring Water | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 59/100 | 67/100 |
| Product compared | Ozarka Spring Water Plastic Bottle | Saratoga Spring Water Glass Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Spring | Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Glass |
| Microplastics risk | High | Low |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | Yes | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 8 | 12 |
| pH | 6.2 | 7.82 |
| TDS (minerals) | 94 ppm | 38.8 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | 0 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Ozarka | Saratoga Spring Water |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 0/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 22/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 0/7 |
| PFAS testing | 5/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Ozarka and Saratoga Spring Water.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Ozarka or Saratoga Spring Water?
Saratoga Spring Water is the healthier choice, scoring 67/100 versus 59/100 for Ozarka. The biggest differences are packaging material.
Is Ozarka or Saratoga Spring Water better for avoiding microplastics?
Ozarka (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Saratoga Spring Water (glass) has a low risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Ozarka or Saratoga Spring Water?
Ozarka has more dissolved minerals (94 ppm TDS vs 38.8 ppm).

