Zephyrhills vs Aqua Carpatica: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Aqua Carpatica is the healthier choice, scoring 80/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are contaminants and packaging material.
Side-by-side comparison
| Zephyrhills | Aqua Carpatica | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 56/100 | 80/100 |
| Product compared | Zephyrhill Plastic Bottle | Aqua Carpatica Spring Water Glass Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Spring | Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Glass |
| Microplastics risk | High | Low |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | No | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 9 | 4 |
| pH | 7.95 | 8.3 |
| TDS (minerals) | 230 ppm | 205 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | 0 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Zephyrhills | Aqua Carpatica |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 22/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 22/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 0/7 |
| PFAS testing | 0/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Zephyrhills and Aqua Carpatica.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Zephyrhills or Aqua Carpatica?
Aqua Carpatica is the healthier choice, scoring 80/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are contaminants and packaging material.
Is Zephyrhills or Aqua Carpatica better for avoiding microplastics?
Zephyrhills (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Aqua Carpatica (glass) has a low risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Zephyrhills or Aqua Carpatica?
Zephyrhills has more dissolved minerals (230 ppm TDS vs 205 ppm).

