Ice Mountain vs Zephyrhills: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Ice Mountain is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are PFAS testing.
Side-by-side comparison
| Ice Mountain | Zephyrhills | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 59/100 | 56/100 |
| Product compared | Ice Mountain Spring Water Plastic Bottle | Zephyrhill Plastic Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Spring | Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Plastic |
| Microplastics risk | High | High |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | Yes | No |
| Contaminants flagged | 13 | 9 |
| pH | 7.2 | 7.95 |
| TDS (minerals) | 191 ppm | 230 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0.2 mg/L | 0 mg/L |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Ice Mountain | Zephyrhills |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 0/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 2/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 7/7 |
| PFAS testing | 5/5 | 0/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Ice Mountain and Zephyrhills.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Ice Mountain or Zephyrhills?
Ice Mountain is the healthier choice, scoring 59/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are PFAS testing.
Is Ice Mountain or Zephyrhills better for avoiding microplastics?
Ice Mountain (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Zephyrhills (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Ice Mountain or Zephyrhills?
Zephyrhills has more dissolved minerals (230 ppm TDS vs 191 ppm).
More comparisons
- Fiji Water vs Ice Mountain
- Evian vs Ice Mountain
- Dasani vs Ice Mountain
- Aquafina vs Ice Mountain
- smartwater vs Ice Mountain
- Poland Spring vs Ice Mountain
- Deer Park vs Ice Mountain
- Arrowhead vs Ice Mountain
- Ozarka vs Ice Mountain
- Ice Mountain vs Kirkland Signature
- Ice Mountain vs Pure Life
- Ice Mountain vs Essentia Water

