Zephyrhills vs Eternal Water: which water is healthier?
Updated · Scores from third-party lab reports · How we score
Eternal Water is the healthier choice, scoring 85/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are contaminants and PFAS testing.
Side-by-side comparison
| Zephyrhills | Eternal Water | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 56/100 | 85/100 |
| Product compared | Zephyrhill Plastic Bottle | Eternal Water Gallon |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Spring | Mountain Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Plastic |
| Microplastics risk | High | High |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | No | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 9 | 2 |
| pH | 7.95 | 8.1 |
| TDS (minerals) | 230 ppm | 110 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | — |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Zephyrhills | Eternal Water |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 44/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 2/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 7/7 |
| PFAS testing | 0/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Zephyrhills and Eternal Water.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Zephyrhills or Eternal Water?
Eternal Water is the healthier choice, scoring 85/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are contaminants and PFAS testing.
Is Zephyrhills or Eternal Water better for avoiding microplastics?
Zephyrhills (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Eternal Water (plastic) has a high risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Zephyrhills or Eternal Water?
Zephyrhills has more dissolved minerals (230 ppm TDS vs 110 ppm).