Zephyrhills vs Mountain Valley: which water is healthier?
Updated Β· Scores from third-party lab reports Β· How we score
Mountain Valley is the healthier choice, scoring 68/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are packaging material and PFAS testing.
Side-by-side comparison
| Zephyrhills | Mountain Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Purity score | 56/100 | 68/100 |
| Product compared | Zephyrhill Plastic Bottle | Mountain Valley Spring Water Glass Bottle |
| Type | Still | Still |
| Water source | Spring | Mountain Spring |
| Packaging | Plastic | Glass |
| Microplastics risk | High | Low |
| Lab tested | Yes | Yes |
| PFAS tested | No | Yes |
| Contaminants flagged | 9 | 5 |
| pH | 7.95 | 8.2 |
| TDS (minerals) | 230 ppm | 202 ppm |
| Fluoride | 0 mg/L | β |
Score breakdown
| Factor | Zephyrhills | Mountain Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Lab report indexed | 45/45 | 45/45 |
| Contaminants | 0/50 | 2/50 |
| Water source | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Mineral preservation | 17/17 | 17/17 |
| Packaging material | 2/22 | 22/22 |
| Cap material | 7/7 | 0/7 |
| PFAS testing | 0/5 | 5/5 |
Each brand is represented by its most popular product. See all products from Zephyrhills and Mountain Valley.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Zephyrhills or Mountain Valley?
Mountain Valley is the healthier choice, scoring 68/100 versus 56/100 for Zephyrhills. The biggest differences are packaging material and PFAS testing.
Is Zephyrhills or Mountain Valley better for avoiding microplastics?
Zephyrhills (plastic) has a high microplastics risk and Mountain Valley (glass) has a low risk, based on packaging material.
Which has more minerals, Zephyrhills or Mountain Valley?
Zephyrhills has more dissolved minerals (230 ppm TDS vs 202 ppm).

